Tag Archives: stephen Krahsen

Get the Most Out of Calendar Talk

Calendar talk is a CI (Comprehensible Input) activity that is part of many teachers’ routines in the classroom.  It is essentially just that, talking about the calendar.  What began as simply saying the date has grown into much more than that. I spoke with John Sifert on episode #170 of the podcast and he offered useful and actionable insights into how Calendar Talk is much more than calendars.  In this post I want to share with you my own process of doing this type of activity that engages students on a wide variety of topics as we begin the class.  You can download my Spanish Google Slides with all of the embedded links right here if you want to try it out yourself and save lots of time.

Get the Most Out of Calendar Talk; French, Spanish, CI, Comprehensible Input

We start with the date. This is rather simple and straight forward and you can get as elaborate as you would like depending on the proficiency level of the class.  For more novice level students I put the digits with the numbers, but leave out the numbers once these are no longer needed.  You’ll also see the date structure across the top to support students early on.  Again, as students are more proficient I begin to remove the supports.

Get the Most Out of Calendar Talk; French, Spanish, CI, Comprehensible Input

Get the Most Out of Calendar Talk; French, Spanish, CI, Comprehensible Input

Saying the date is just step 1.  We then look at the details and questions to the right on the slide.  We look at what may be happening on this day or during the week.  Are there sports or drama practices?  Is there a game?  If so, where and who is the opponent?  Was there a game yesterday?  What was the score?  Who won?  Are there assessments in any of your other classes today or this week?  Is it anyone’s birthday?  Does anyone in your family have a birthday today?

There are lots of questions and comments to make the date more engaging for higher levels, such as looking at events that have happened on this date in history either in your community/country or in a country of the target language culture.  You can also have students say what the date was yesterday and what it will be tomorrow.  As you can see, there are lots of opportunities to introduce and embed vocabulary and structures into these discussions. They will also organically recycle themselves as you repeat this activity in your classroom.

We then move onto the weather.  There is a slide that has images of weather with the phrases. For more advanced groups I don’t have the words, but just the images to support students.

Get the Most Out of Calendar Talk; French, Spanish, CI, Comprehensible Input

We then continue with the time. Initially I use a slide with lots of support and scaffolding, but remove most of these details as we move on in proficiency and students can rely on their own language to produce language.

Get the Most Out of Calendar Talk; French, Spanish, CI, Comprehensible Input

Once we have talked about what is happening in our community, including the date, weather and time, the fun really begins.  It’s now time to look at and compare these details to what is happening in the world, with a particular focus on the target language countries.  There are many ways that you may want to go about this, but this is the process that has worked well for me.

I have the flags for target language countries (Spanish in these examples) in a small basket.  One student chooses a paper with the flag and identifies the country.  They can seek help from a classmate if needed, but they begin to recognize them fairly quickly after a while.  You may want to begin with the name of the country with the flag.

Get the Most Out of Calendar Talk; French, Spanish, CI, Comprehensible Input

We then talk about some country details, such as the colors of the flag, the capital, the nationality, location, weather and time.  To help with the visuals I have location, weather and time websites linked on a slide for quick and easy access. When you click on the link with the country name it takes you to the specific country information.

Get the Most Out of Calendar Talk; French, Spanish, CI, Comprehensible Input

When talking about the location we focus on borders and surrounding countries, the capital and other cities, towns and land features.  Are there lakes and what are the oceans or seas? What countries border to the north, south, east or west?

Get the Most Out of Calendar Talk; French, Spanish, CI, Comprehensible Input

When we talk about the weather we can see some visuals and also look at how the temperature is displayed.  For countries that use a different system (Celsius or Fahrenheit) this is a great opportunity to practice numbers.  For lower level students I have a conversion chart on the wall, but for your more advanced students, who may be learning about this in their science class, they could perhaps do the conversion on their own.

Get the Most Out of Calendar Talk; French, Spanish, CI, Comprehensible InputGet the Most Out of Calendar Talk; French, Spanish, CI, Comprehensible Input

Get the Most Out of Calendar Talk; French, Spanish, CI, Comprehensible Input

When we talk about time I begin by asking students if they think there is a time difference between where we are and the country we are looking at.  If there is a time difference, how many hours?  Is it earlier or later?  This also provides an excellent opportunity to look at concepts such as daylight savings because the same country may be a different time depending on the months.

Get the Most Out of Calendar Talk; French, Spanish, CI, Comprehensible Input

Get the Most Out of Calendar Talk; French, Spanish, CI, Comprehensible Input

I particularly like this process with students because it gives them regular opportunities to use a lot of these common and necessary language elements in a very contextualized way.  It also organically exposes them to the ideas like differences in weather, time and geography.  As students engage in reading and various authentic documents from target language cultures they often refer back to these details that they learned in these Calendar Talk activities.

Input and Output in the Language Classroom

Language acquisition is a multifaceted process, shaped by various factors and methodologies. The ideas of input and output often play a significant role in any discussion of how language is acquired.  Let’s look at the intricate interplay between input and output, drawing insights from the book “Common Ground” by Florencia Henshaw and Maris Hawkins.

Input and Output in the Language Classroom (French, Spanish)

How is Language Acquired?

At its core, language acquisition is an implicit process, unconsciously constructing a linguistic system by connecting form and meaning based on the input we receive. It’s the subconscious work that takes place while we’re immersed in comprehending messages, operating beyond our conscious control. Language acquisition thrives on grasping the portions of input that assist in decoding the intended message, as opposed to consciously dissecting language rules.

Communication, conversely, revolves around the deliberate interpretation and expression of meaning. Our focal point on communication hinges on two pivotal questions: What information or content is being conveyed? And what will the audience do with this information? These inquiries form the bedrock of meaningful interaction and exchange.

The Role of Input

Input serves as the cornerstone of language acquisition since understanding must precede the establishment of form-meaning connections.

The Role of Comprehensible Input

Krashen’s Input Hypothesis introduces the concept that learners progress in language when they comprehend input that is slightly beyond their current proficiency level, often referred to as “i+1.” While Krashen’s ideas have evolved and faced criticism, a consensus remains regarding the importance of comprehensible input. Crafting such input involves a combination of strategies:

  • Ensuring that the topic and text type align with students’ proficiency levels.
  • Employing visual cues, body language, and target language equivalents.
  • Utilizing examples that relate to common associations and cognates.
  • Gradually delivering content and simplifying language.
  • Embracing circumlocution to convey intended meaning.
  • Incorporating authentic resources to provide genuine context.
  • Implementing comprehension checks to maintain communication-driven interactions.

While explicit instruction isn’t deemed necessary for acquisition, directing learners’ attention to grammatical forms during meaningful communication can be beneficial in strengthening form-meaning connections.

The Role of Output

Output, defined as the production of the target language to convey meaning, plays an essential but distinct role in language development. Merrill Swain’s Output Hypothesis suggests that pushing learners to produce accurate and meaningful messages facilitates language development by prompting them to pay closer attention to linguistic form. Output assists learners in recognizing their gaps in knowledge and affords opportunities for testing hypotheses. However, Hawkins and Henshaw contend that output doesn’t construct the linguistic system; its primary function lies in helping learners identify their input needs.

While there is often a significant emphasis on input, the role of output remains paramount, particularly in communicative language teaching. Traditional teaching methods tend to prioritize output, associating communication primarily with speaking and writing. However, the equilibrium between input and output isn’t dictated by a fixed ratio. Instead, it is essential to provide ample communicative input and grant the linguistic system the time it requires to develop organically, particularly at the novice level.

You can also listen to episode 63 of the World Language Classroom Podcast where I go in-depth on the topic of input and output.

In Conclusion

The journey of language acquisition involves a delicate dance between input and output. Both are integral components, each contributing uniquely to the development of linguistic competence. By understanding their roles and finding a harmonious equilibrium, educators can guide learners towards achieving language proficiency and effective communication.

Reference:

Henshaw, Florencia Gilio, and Maris Hawkins. Common Ground Second Language Acquisition Theory Goes to the Classroom. Focus, an Imprint of Hackett Publishing Company, 2022.

Sales, Antonia De. “The Output Hypothesis and its Influence in Second language Learning/Teaching: An interview with Merrill Swain.” Interfaces Brasil/Canadá, vol. 20, 2020, pp. 1–12,

Compelling Input and Output in the Language Classroom

It is essential that language be comprehensible so that that students can make form-meaning connections, however it also has to be of interest and compelling to learners. This is what motivates them to engage and make meaning. But, what about how students use the language they are acquiring?  That also needs to be compelling to students.  Let’s look at how to make input compelling along with output activities that are of particular interest to learners as well.

Compelling Input and Compelling Output, Comprehensible Inout, CI, French and Spanish.

Comprehensible Input Hypothesis:

  • Language acquisition occurs when learners are exposed to messages that are slightly beyond their current level of language competence
  • Learners acquire language subconsciously, through their own natural processing abilities, rather than through direct instruction or explicit grammar rules.

Compelling Input Hypothesis:

  • Learners are more likely to acquire language when they are exposed to messages that are interesting, engaging, and personally relevant to them.
  • Compelling input captures learners’ attention and motivates them to engage with the language, which can lead to more effective language acquisition.

Making Input Compelling:

  • Incorporate authentic materials, such as news articles, podcasts, videos, and TV shows, that are interesting and relevant to your students’ interests and cultural background. The format can be as compelling as the topic.
  • What movies, TV shows, books, games, sports events or local events are happening? School related activities?
  • Use exit tickets to figure out what the interests are?  Use Card Talk Drawings.
  • Focus on meaningful communication instead of grammar rules. Research has shown that language acquisition is more effective when students are focused on meaning rather than form.
  • at their age and proficiency level

Compelling Input and Compelling Output, Comprehensible Inout, CI, French and Spanish.

Compelling Input and Compelling Output, Comprehensible Inout, CI, French and Spanish.

 Making Output Compelling:

  • Provide students with opportunities to use the language in authentic situations, such as role-playing scenarios, mock interviews, and real-life simulations. 
  • Give students choice and autonomy in their learning by allowing them to select their own topics and projects. 
  • Provide feedback that is specific, actionable, and focuses on both form and meaning. 
  • Use the same formats for making input compelling to provide opportunities for compelling output.

Compelling Input and Compelling Output, Comprehensible Inout, CI, French and Spanish.

Compelling Input and Compelling Output, Comprehensible Inout, CI, French and Spanish.

Podcast episode on this topic:

References:

  • Krashen, S. D. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implication. 
  • Krashen, S. D. (2011). The Compelling (not just interesting) Input Hypothesis  

72: What Does it Mean to “Teach” a Language?


What does it mean to “teach” a language? In this episode I look at this question, particularly considering the shifts in language teaching and learning over the past 10 years or so. My approach to this question is grounded in a quote from Larson-Freeman and Long that a professor shared with me in graduate school. It continues to guide my approach to teaching.

“[It is not] because some plants will grow in a desert, [that] watering the ones in your garden is a waste of time. In fact, of course, while the desert may provide the minimum conditions for a plant to grow, watering it may help it grow faster, bigger, and stronger, that is to realize its full potential.”    [Diane Larsen-Freeman, Michael H. Long; An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition Research (1990)]

Links mentioned in this episode

Work with Joshua either in person or remotely.

Follow wherever you listen to podcasts.

Teachers want to hear from you and what you are proud of in your classroom.
Join me on the podcast.
We record conversations remotely, so you can be anywhere.

 

32: The Origins of CI: Krashen’s Input Hypothesis


Where does the whole concept and idea behind Comprehensible Input (CI) come from?  In this episode I walk you through Stephen Krashen’s Input Hypothesis that is part of his theory of second language acquisition that he calls the Monitor Model.  Krashen’s Input Hypothesis is the origin of what what we are doing with Comprehensible Input today.

What Is Comprehensible Input?

  • Comprehensible input means that students should be able to understand the essence of what is being said or presented to them.
  • This does not mean, however, that teachers must use only words students understand. In fact, instruction can be incomprehensible even when students know all of the words. 
  • Students learn a new language best when they receive input that is just a bit more difficult than they can easily understand. In other words, students may understand most, but not all, words the teacher is using. (i+1)

Stephen Krashen’s Monitor Model (late 1970’s, early 1980’s):

5 individual, yet somewhat interrelated theories and comprehensible input is just one.

  • Acquisition-Learning hypothesis
  • Input hypothesis
  • Affective Filter hypothesis
  • Natural Order hypothesis
  • Monitor hypothesis

Criticism:

  • Brown (2000): Krashen’s theory of SLA is oversimplified and the claims he made are overstated.
  • McLaughlin (1987): Krashen does not provide evidence in any real sense of the term, but simply argues that certain phenomena can be viewed from the perspective of his theory.
  • Gregg (1984): bypasses counter-evidence

Support:

Lichtman and VanPatten (2021): Was Krashen right? Forty years later

Ideas have evolved and are still driving SLA research today often unacknowledged and under new terminology.

  • The Acquisition-Learning Distinction
    implicit versus explicit learning
  • The Natural Order Hypothesis
    ordered development
  • The Input Hypothesis.
    communicatively embedded input

Motivated Classroom Podcast (Liam Printer) : Episode 50
Translating second language acquisition research into motivational practice with Dr. Karen Lichtman & Dr. Bill VanPatten

Where does this leave us?

Work with Joshua either in person or remotely.

Follow wherever you listen to podcasts.