Category Archives: Teaching Methodology and Research

Cooperative Learning in the Foreign Language Classroom

Cooperative Learning is all about communication so it has an obvious  and useful place in a second language classroom.  In this context the teacher gives students  opportunities to  produce the language through speaking and writing in response to language that they are hearing and reading. Opportunities to engage with the language are an integral part of language acquisition and acquisition of communicative competence.  As foreign language teachers structure these cooperative learning opportunities for their students, these principles should be observed (based on Kagan Structures):

  •  Simultaneous Interaction: The optimal form is pair work, which is very frequently included as a stage in the various structures. Simultaneous interaction can easily increase the student’s speaking time.
  • Equal Participation: All students should contribute equally, with no one being forgotten or opting out.
  •  Positive Interdependence: The structures are built up in such a way that the students in a group need each other’s output if they are to solve the task they have been given.
  • Individual Accountability:  Each Student has an important role in the interactional pattern.  Individual accountability is one of the most important motivating factors in cooperative learning. Individual accountability is also implemented when students are being individually assessed.

Music and Melody Help Retain Foreign Language Vocabulary

images

In 2002,  a doctoral student, Claudia Smith Salcedo,  at the State University of Louisiana wrote a doctoral dissertation on the effect that music and melody have on the retention of foreign language vocabulary.  From the abstract:

“This study investigated the effect of music on text recall and involuntary
mental rehearsal (din) with students from four college-level Beginning Spanish
classes. Two groups heard texts as songs, one group heard the same texts as
speech, and one group was the control group. For the text recall variable, a cloze
test was administered at the end of each song treatment to determine total words
recalled.  Students from one of the music groups heard the melody of the song
while testing. For the din variable, students were asked to report on the amount of this phenomenon experienced.

Immediate recall of text showed higher scores for the music class in all
three songs…. Delayed text recall showed no significant difference between the classes. There was no advantage observed for the group that heard the background melody during testing.

These findings suggest that the use of songs in the foreign language classroom may aid memory of text. The results evidenced that the occurrence of the din is increased with music, and therefore may be a more efficient way to stimulate language acquisition.”

You can read the entire dissertation HERE.

Marzano’s Nine Strategies for Effective Learning

Researchers at Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning (McREL) identified nine instructional strategies that are most likely to improve student achievement across all content areas and across all grade levels. These strategies are explained in the book, Classroom Instruction That Works, by Robert Marzano, Debra Pickering, and Jane Pollock.

These nine strategies have been developed based on review of hundreds of studies in education and teaching and these strategies were most prominent in all of the data that reflected increased learning.  Not all of the techniques will work for every student all the time, but an awareness of them will help to refocus our classroom language learning  and enrichment activities.  These ideas will help guide teachers as they plan speaking, writing, listening and reading activities.  These language skills are inherent in many of the techniques, which make this list very valuable for the foreign language instructor.

Here are the nine strategies along with the increase in student achievement  as a result of implementation.  These percentages are based on standardized tests.

1. Identifying similarities and differences (45%)
2. Summarizing and note taking (34%)
3. Reinforcing effort and providing recognition (29%)
4. Homework and practice (28%)
5. Nonlinguistic representations (27%)
6. Cooperative learning (27%)
7. Setting objectives and providing feedback (23%)
8. Generating and testing hypotheses (23%)
9. Cues, questions, and advance organizers (22%)

Marzano’s Nine Instructional Strategies for Effective Teaching and LearningResearchers at Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning (McREL) have identified nine instructional
strategies that are most likely to improve student achievement across all content areas and across all grade
levels.

Summative and Formative Assessment in the Foreign Language Classroom

Summative and Formative Assessment in the Foreign (World) Language Classroom (French, Spanish) wlteacher.wordpress.com

Summative Assessment: Results are used to make some sort of judgment, such as to determine what grade a student will receive on a classroom assignment or to  determine  progress.  Sometimes referred to as assessment of learning, summative assessments typically documents how much learning has occurred at a point in time.  The purpose is to measure the level of success.

Formative Assessment: Information from formative assessments provide data during the instructional process.  They take place before a summative assessment  Both the teacher and the student use formative assessment results to make decisions about what actions to take to promote further learning. It is an ongoing process that involves far more than testing and measurement of student learning.  It is a means to an end, rather than the end point data that is attained from a summative assessment.

Formative assessment, or Assessment for Learning, can take many different forms in the classroom. It consists of anything teachers do to help students answer three questions (Atkin, Black, & Coffey, 2001):

  • Where am I going?
  • Where am I now?
  • How can I get to where I am going/need to be?

The biggest value of formative assessment is the opportunity to use results to improve real-time teaching and learning .

Atkin, J. M., Black, P., & Coffey, J. (2001). Classroom assessment and the national science standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Retention of Information

Consider the results of this study (Pike, 1989) that considered the percentage of information that learners retain via particular methods as you plan your class lessons.

 

Language Teaching Methodologies Through the Years

Language Teaching Methodologies Through the Years (French, Spanish) wlteacher.wordpress.com

Here is a reference to the major trends in language teaching methodology that have surfaced in the last century.  I have found that a general knowledge of these is helpful in exploring proficiency-based teaching.  Though most have been proven to be quite ineffective, understanding why they are not effective is important to remind ourselves of what we should avoid in the classroom as we teach toward language proficiency.

  • Grammar-Translation Method: It consisted mainly of exhaustive use of dictionaries, explanations of grammatical rules (in English), some sample sentences, and exercise drills to practice the new structures.
  • Cognitive Approach: This approach introduced the four principle language skills for the first time: listening, speaking, reading, and writing. Oral communicative competence became the focus. Comprehensible auditory input became important and speaking in the target language began to occur. Learning about the language was overemphasized.
  • Audio-Lingual Method: Lessons often began with a sample dialogue to be recited and memorized. This was followed up with substitution pattern and saturation drills in which the grammatical structure previously introduced was reinforced.  Repetition, substitution, transformation, and translation were the drills. This method favored habit-forming drill techniques.
  • The Direct Method:. Reference to English equivalents became discouraged. Grammar learning became inductive in nature without overt explanations. Teacher/student interaction became fuller, guessing of context or content and completing fill-ins. Accuracy in pronunciation and oral expression became vital. Examples to be followed became the main intention.
  • The Silent Way: Dr.Caleb Gattegno, originally out of Alexandria, Egypt, introduced this classroom technique wherein the teacher remains silent while pupils output the language on cue through perpetual prompting. This is the production before meaning school of thought and practice. A color-coded phonics (sound) chart called a fidel, with both vowel and consonant clusters on it, is projected onto a screen to be used simultaneously with a pointer, thus permitting the pupil to produce orally on a continuous basis in the target language, vía a sequence of phonemes or sound units. The Silent Way truly gives students a spoken facility.
  • Suggestopedia: This extremely esoteric, avant-garde method is subconsciously subliminal in texture. It is based on the pioneering efforts in 1967 of Bulgarian medical doctor, hypnotist, and psychology professor Georgi Lozanov and on his techniques into superlearning. Classes are small and intensive, with a low-stress focus.  Material is presented in an especially melodic and artistic way. By activating the right “creative side” of the brain, a much larger portion of the intellectual potential can be tapped, thus drawing out long-term memory.  This innovative approach to language pedagogy maximizes the learners’ natural holistic talents.  Background classical or baroque chamber music, oftentimes accompanied with soft lights, pillows or cushions on the floor for relaxation, accentuate active and passive meditations, séances, yoga, breathing exercises leading into the “alpha state”, songs for memorization purposes, therapy sessions and stream-of-consciousness catharsis in the target language with little reliance on English.
  • Total Physical Response (TPR): This approach, also known as TPR, was founded by James Asher. In this method, both language and body movement are synchronized through action responses and use of the imperative (direct commands). TPR may be used in conjunction with some other methods involving psychoneuro kinetic techniques wherein the teacher gives a host of commands with the students then responding by “acting out” the command: “Stand up”, “Go to the door”, “Sit down”, etc. Kinetic movement of the hands and arms is incorporated in lieu of rote memorization. Student speech is delayed until they feel comfortable enough to give other students commands too. TPR is very effective in teaching temporal states, personal pronouns, and other deep grammatical structures.
  • TPRS (Teaching Proficiency through Reading and Storytelling) : Developed by Blaine Ray, TPRS is influenced by the work of Dr. James Asher and Dr. Stephen Krashen.  TPRS® combines Dr. Asher’s Total Physical Response (TPR) with Dr. Krashen’s language acquisition strategies, allowing teachers to focus on using the target language providing amble exposure to concentrated, comprehensible input. The by-product of telling stories and providing this type of input is that students build proficiency and fluency with the abilities to use the language.The main goal in classrooms is to utilize comprehensible input in order to help our students become proficient in understanding, reading, writing, and eventually speaking their new language
  • The Natural Approach (Communicative): Originally developed by Tracy Terrell and Stephen Krashen, this acquisition-focused approach sees communicative competence progressing through three stages: (a) aural comprehension, (b) early speech production, and (c) speech activities, all fostering “natural” language acquisition, much as a child would learn his/her native tongue. Following an initial “silent period”, comprehension should precede production in speech, as the latter should be allowed to emerge in natural stages or progressions. Lowering of the Affective Filter is of paramount importance. Only the target language is used in class now, introducing the “total immersion” concept for the very first time, with auditory input for the student becoming paramount. Errors in speech are not corrected aloud. Now the classroom becomes more student-centered with the teacher allowing for students to output the language more often on their own. Formal sequencing of grammatical concepts is kept to a minimum.
  • OWL (Organic World Language) Proficiency-Based language teaching that focuses on the ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines and the Oral Proficiency Interview (OPI). Darcy Rogers is the Founder of OWL, and began developing the methodology in 2003. Her work is based on second language acquisition research, student motivation, and best teaching practices. Focusing on creating a space for second language to be naturally acquired, she believes in placing emphasis on students developing language through movement, social interaction, play and 100% immersion. The goals of OWL are: 1.) To use the second language 100% of the time  2.) To not be afraid of a second language environment 3.) Take risks and break down the filter (make mistakes!) 4.) To be able to infer and circumlocute  5.) To participate & be part of a community.
  • AIM (Accelerative Integrated Methodology): Developed by Wendy Maxwell, authentic learning is achieved through scaffolding techniques which use story-telling, gestures, active collaboration and repetition. The use of high-frequency vocabulary, introduced with gestures and contextualized in stories, drama, songs and dance, allows students to rapidly achieve levels of oral and written proficiency rarely seen with conventional methods.
  1. Grammar-Translation Method (1890s-1930s): Around the turn-of-the-century, language students often translated cumbersome volumes from Classical Greek or Latin into English vía this approach. It consisted mainly of exhaustive use of dictionaries, explanations of grammatical rules (in English), some sample sentences, and exercise drills to practice the new structures. Little opportunity for real second-language acquisition existed then.
  2. Cognitive Approach (1940s-1950s): This approach introduced the four principle language skills for the first time: listening, speaking, reading, and writing. Oral communicative competence became the focus. Comprehensible auditory input became important and speaking in the target language began to occur. Learning about the language was overemphasized.
  3. Audio-Lingüal Method (1950s-1960s): With the advent and popularity of audio tapes, this approach ushered in the first recordings wherein the language learner could actually hear and mimic native speakers on reel-to-reel audio tapes, often used with earphones in a language lab setting. Lessons often began with a sample dialogue to be recited and memorized. This was followed up with substitution pattern and saturation drills in which the grammatical structure previously introduced was reinforced, with emphasis given to rapid fire student response. Repetition, substitution, transformation, and translation became the order of the day. This method was strongly influenced by B.F. Skinner’s behaviorist view toward learning which favored habit-forming drill techniques. Unfortunately, most students couldn’t transfer these dialogues into their own real-life experiences.
  4. The Direct Method (1970s): This method presented discussion in the target language as the major priority. Reference to English equivalents became discouraged. Grammar learning became inductive in nature without overt explanations given the pupil. Teacher/student interaction became fuller, guessing of context or content, completing fill-ins, and doing “cloze” exercises were the order of the day. Accuracy in pronunciation and oral expression became vital. Examples to be followed became the main intention.
  5. The Natural/Communicative Approach (1960s-2000s): Originally developed by Tracy Terrell and Stephen Krashen, this acquisition-focused approach sees communicative competence progressing through three stages: (a) aural comprehension, (b) early speech production, and (c) speech activities, all fostering “natural” language acquisition, much as a child would learn his/her native tongue. Following an initial “silent period”, comprehension should precede production in speech, as the latter should be allowed to emerge in natural stages or progressions. Lowering of the Affective Filter is of paramount importance. Only the target language is used in class now, introducing the “total immersion” concept for the very first time, with auditory input for the student becoming paramount. Errors in speech are not corrected aloud. Now enters the era of glossy textbooks, replete with cultural vignettes, glossaries, vocabulary lists, and glazed photographs. A deliberate, conscious approach to the study of grammar is considered to have only modest value in the language learning process. Pairing off of students into small groups to practice newly acquired structures becomes the major focus. Visualization activities that often times make use of a picture file, slide presentations, word games, dialogues, contests, recreational activities, empirical utterances, and realia provide situations with problem-solving tasks which might include the use of charts, maps, graphs, and advertisements, all to be performed on the spot in class. Now the classroom becomes more student-centered with the teacher allowing for students to output the language more often on their own. Formal sequencing of grammatical concepts is kept to a minimum.
  6. Total Physical Response/TPR (1960s-2000s): This approach, also known as TPR, was founded by James Asher. In this method, both language and body movement are synchronized through action responses and use of the imperative (direct commands). TPR may be used in conjunction with some other methods involving psychoneuro kinetic techniques wherein the teacher gives a host of commands with the students then responding by “acting out” the command: “Stand up”, “Go to the door”, “Sit down”, etc. Kinetic movement of the hands and arms is incorporated in lieu of rote memorization. Student speech is delayed until they feel comfortable enough to give other students commands too. TPR is very effective in teaching temporal states, personal pronouns, and other deep grammatical structures.
  7. The Silent Way (1960s-2000s): Dr.Caleb Gattegno, originally out of Alexandria, Egypt, introduced this classroom technique wherein the teacher remains silent while pupils output the language on cue through perpetual prompting. This is the production before meaning school of thought and practice. A color-coded phonics (sound) chart called a fidel, with both vowel and consonant clusters on it, is projected onto a screen to be used simultaneously with a pointer, thus permitting the pupil to produce orally on a continuous basis in the target language, vía a sequence of phonemes or sound units. Brightly colored Cuisenaire rods, which are also used in Mathematics, are integrated into this method (used as manipulatives) for pupils to learn spatial relationships, prepositions, colors, gender and number concepts, and to create multiple artificial settings through their physical placement. Lines or blank spaces on a chalkboard represent syllables, devoid of letters in them, for a subliminal, collective memory experience in recall for the students. Students are encouraged to self-correct their pronunciation errors through manual gesticulation on the part of the instructor. Modeling of correct pronunciation for students is discouraged. The greatest strength of this method lies in its ability to draw students out orally, while the teacher “takes a back seat”. This method works most effectively with round tables being used to promote small group discussion and for ample student rotation. In general, reliance on and the use of a structured textbook or an outlined syllabus is much discouraged during the initial phases of learning. The Silent Way truly gives students a spoken facility.
  8. Suggestopedia (1960s-2000s): This extremely esoteric, avant-garde method is subconsciously subliminal in texture. It is based on the pioneering efforts in 1967 of Bulgarian medical doctor, hypnotist, and psychology professor Georgi Lozanov and on his techniques into superlearning. Classes are small and intensive, with a low-stress focus.  Material is presented in an especially  melodic and artistic way. By activating the right “creative side” of the brain, a much larger portion of the intellectual potential can be tapped, thus drawing out long-term memory.  This innovative approach to language pedagogy maximizes the learners’ natural holistic talents.  Background classical or baroque chamber music, oftentimes accompanied with soft lights, pillows or cushions on the floor for relaxation, accentuate active and passive meditations, séances, yoga, breathing exercises leading into the “alpha state”, songs for memorization purposes, therapy sessions and stream-of-consciousness catharsis in the target language with little reliance on English. Little emphasis on grammar is given. Such non-verbal communication as kinesics, paralanguage, environmental proxemics, and oculesics can be incorporated into the method, along with Robert Rosenthal’s Pygmalia used in the classroom. Soviet Hypnopedia (sleep-learning) which was developed by such researchers as A.M. Syvadoshch in Leningrad and by L.A. Bliznitchenko in Kiev, Sophrology (a memory training system), the Tomatis Approach, Schultz-Luthe’s autogenic therapy, Suggestology, and the Suzuki Method of learning music are considered to be closely related to this Bulgarian approach. This method has sprung two offshoots or derivatives which include Donald Schuster’s Suggestive-Accelerative Learning and Teaching (or SALT) and Lynn Dhority’s Acquisition through Creative Teaching (or ACT). Like other “modern” approaches, language is perceived globally (in chunks or blocks), while attention to fine tuning or to detail comes later.

Dr. Patricia Kuhl on Language Development

This is a great talk by Dr. Patricia Kuhl on language development in children.  She presents her research and findings, that are interesting and fascinating.

Foreign Language Assessment: Knowing about language and doing something with language

Assessments often focus on knowing about the language at the exclusion of what the student can do with the language.  Below are some guidelines to help distinguish these two practices.  Take some time to find the balance of assessing what students can do with the language (context-based) and what they know about the language (minimal context).  I focus on the language particulars more when tasks involve writing and more on what students can do with the language when speaking.

Foreign Language Assessment: Knowing about language and doing something with language (French, Spanish) www.wlclassroom.com

These are some assessment characteristics that show what students know about  language:

  • They assess discrete points.
  • The answers are either right or wrong.
  • They are easily and quickly scored.
  • They test language content: vocabulary, grammar, and culture.
  • They involve the lower-level thinking skills of knowledge and comprehension.
  • They are usually given in formal testing periods.

These are some assessment characteristics that show what students can do with language:

  • They require that students create a product or do a demonstration.
  • They are scored holistically.
  • They are task-based.
  • The tasks are situation-based or use real-world content.
  • They involve higher-level thinking skills of application, integration, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation.
  • They are given in both formal and informal testing situations.

Take a look at the tasks and activities that you give students and determine what it is that they are actually assessing.  Are they focused on what students know about the language or what they can do with the language?

Activities that show what students know about language:

  • True/false
  • Multiple choice
  • Fill in the blanks
  • Match
  • Give the correct form of the noun, adjective, verb
  • Change one word for another, e.g. noun for pronoun
  • State the facts
  • Translate
  • Follow the model
  • Repeat, recite
  • Answer the questions

Activities that show what students can do with the language:

  • Complete the sentence logically.
  • State your opinion, thoughts, or comments.
  • Give personal answers.
  • Create a situation.
  • Seek information.
  • Develop a product, e.g. advertisement, brochure, collage, poem, song, essay, video, etc.
  • Demonstrate your knowledge.
  • Summarize, paraphrase.
  • Change the ending.

Find the balance in assessment and make sure that there are opportunities for students to demonstrate what they can do with the language in addition to what they know about it.

The PACE Model

The PACE Model (Donato and Adair-Hauck, 1992) encourages the language learner to reflect on the use of target language forms.  Essentially the teacher and learners collaborate and co-construct a grammar explanation.

Download PDF with PACE Model Explanation and Lesson Plan Template.

The PACE Model (French, Spanish) wlclassroom.com

Much like  authentic language  learning that happens outside of the classroom, this approach stresses that learning happens between people through social interaction (reminiscent of Vygotsky).  The PACE model requires the learner to be an active participant in the language learning process.

Download PDF with PACE Model Explanation and Lesson Plan Template.

The PACE model is a “four-step” process that includes elements that encourage student comprehension and participation. The four stages are:

1. PRESENTATION :
The teacher foreshadows the grammar structure with an appropriate text, with emphasis on meaning. Typically, the teacher recycles the storyline through pictures, TPR activities, etc., to increase comprehension and student
participation.  The focus is not on the grammar structure at this point, but it is used by the teacher and in the text.

2. ATTENTION :
The teacher now has students focus on the language form or structure through the use of  images or highlighting a particular linguistic form.

3. CO-CONSTRUCTION :
After the teacher has focused student attention on a particular target-language form, together they co-construct the grammatical explanation. The teacher provides scaffolding and assists the learners with questions that encourage them to reflect, predict and form generalizations regarding the consistencies  of the language.  Students “write” their own grammar rules, guided by the teacher who will make sure that they end up with an appropriate explanation.

4. EXTENSION :
The learners use grammatical structures to complete a task relating to the
theme of the lesson, which helps the language remain communicative while also highlighting a particular structure.

The PACE Model is a great way to teach grammar as a concept, one of the ACTFL Core Practices.

Download PDF with PACE Model Explanation and Lesson Plan Template.

Reference: Donato, R. & B. Adair-Hauk. “A Whole Language Approach to Focus on Form.” Paper presented at the American Council for the Teaching of Foreign Languages. San Antonio,Texas (1992).